The article below may contain offensive and/or incorrect content.Shanks et al. (2015) challenged the evidence that various forms of decision making can be influenced by romantic/mating primes. In their comment, Sundie, Beal, Neuberg, and Kenrick (2019) question both the meta-analysis and the 8 studies Shanks et al. reported, and describe an alternative p-curve analysis that they interpret as showing that romantic priming is a genuine phenomenon. In this reply, we comment on several contradictions in Sundie et al.'s article. First, they suggest that Shanks et al.'s replication experiments yielded different results from the original studies because we failed to appreciate the contextual sensitivity of romantic priming effects, but this argument rests largely on evidence from the very studies we were unable to replicate, and a wealth of other evidence suggests that social priming effects are largely invariant across samples and settings. Second, Sundie et al. criticize the selection rule by which Shanks et al. identified relevant priming studies, but then go on to include exactly the same set of studies in their p-curve analysis. Third, they criticize Shanks et al.'s selection of statistical results from these studies and propose a much wider selection, but then acknowledge that their selection process is poorly suited to assessing publication bias and p-hacking. Fourth, we show that their p-curve analysis, far from demonstrating that this literature is unaffected by p-hacking, in fact shows the exact opposite. Sundie et al. claim that Shanks et al.'s priming manipulation was demonstrably weak, but their argument is based on a confusion between different dependent measures. We conclude that romantic priming remains unproven, and urge researchers in this field to undertake high-powered preregistered replication studies. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)
- Acupuncture May Help Ease PTSD After Natural Disaster
- Syrian Woman in Wheelchair Tells U.N. Disabled Are Invisible
- California Moves to Ban Racial Discrimination Based on Hairstyles
- Transgender Rights Advance in Pakistan Province
- U.S. Teen Depression Is on the Rise
- People Report More Diversity, Gender Equality, Finds Global Study
- What to know about Piaget’s stages of cognitive development
- Interracial Couples Stand Out in Post-Apartheid South Africa
- Adoption in the service of child protection: An international interdisciplinary perspective.
- Communicating violence risk during testimony: Do different formats lead to different perceptions among jurors?
- Bridging mental health and criminal justice systems: A systematic review of the impact of mental health courts on individuals and communities.
- Juvenilesâ€™ beliefs about and perceptions of probation predict technical violations and delinquency.
- Research notes: John Bowlbyâ€™s critical evaluation of the work of RenÃ© Spitz.
- Society for the History of Psychology news.
- Poetry corner: Personality assessment scales: Psychometric and poetic.
- Why we should be reading Vittorio Benussi.
- Who first created the Chinese term for psychology—<em>Xin Li Xue</em>?
- How ketamine can change the brain to fight depression
- Blog Post » Progress and Priorities in Autism Research: It’s Beginning to Feel a Lot Like Springtime
- Audio » Autism in Adults
- Scientific Meeting » NIMH Special Event for Autism Awareness Month – A Woman’s Voice: Understanding Autistic Needs
- [CROSS-POST] I-O Psychologists’ Passion Projects: Increasing Fairness for Job Seekers with Criminal Records
- Earth Day 2019: Who’s to Blame for High Temps and Wild Weather?
- United Methodists Edge Toward Breakup Over LGBT Policies
- Psychological Intervention Helps Patients Prevent Gum Disease
- Darkness All Around: Humor, Personality, and Creativity
- Postpartum depression is one of the most common complications of childbirth
- Can vacations live up to their reputation?
- Ancestry.com Apologizes and Pulls Ad “Romanticizing” Slavery
- Transgender Youths Face Tough Decision on Preserving Fertility