The article below may contain offensive and/or incorrect content.Prior research, using correlational and self-report methodologies, suggests that religion and public welfare function as alternate security/insurance systems. Consequently, in countries with more expansive public welfare systems people report less religiosity. The present studies expand this field by utilizing experimental methodology and by replicating and extending two previous experiments in both a secular/welfare state context (Sweden) and a religious/nonwelfare state context (the United States). In the first set of experiments, we tested if cognitive access to religious and welfare-related mental schemas differ depending on context. We also tested whether previous findings indicating that people cognitively turn to religion when exposed to threat replicate and extend to the welfare system. In the second set of experiments, we tested whether religious and welfare reminders lead to increased risk taking in these contexts. Our findings show that participants in the secular/welfare state context had lower cognitive access to religious schemas and were less willing to take risks after religious reminders. However, our findings did not replicate those from previous studies; our participants did not have increased cognitive access to religion, nor public welfare, after threat primes. Similarly, our participants were generally not more prone to risk taking after reminders of religion (or public welfare), although such an effect was obtained specifically on high-religious participants. We conclude that cultural context is important to consider when studying psychological functions of religion, and we suggest that the failed replications may be due to cultural, contextual factors. Finally, religious reminders may have contradictory influences on risk taking. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved)
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: Anxious about the news? Our top tips on how to cope
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: U.S. adults who binge drink are drinking even more
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: The surprising link between depression and the pursuit of happiness
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: Rich people are staying healthy for almost a decade longer than poor people
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: Women who had early miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy more likely to have PTSD
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: What is the difference between anorexia and bulimia?
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: Making art helps your brain
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: Languages affected differently by brain disease
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: Protests linked to post-traumatic stress disorder
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: Thousands of LA jail inmates should receive community mental health support
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: How the ‘rubber hand illusion’ may help those with OCD
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: Video » Discover NIMH: Dr. Sarah Lisanby on Brain Stimulation Therapy
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: Video » Discover NIMH: A Former Patient Feels Hope Through Research
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: How to handle work stress: Add a desk plant
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: Program aims to help men talk about mental health
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: A tiny wage increase could have prevented 13,800 deaths in 6 years
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: Does music make exercise more effective?
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: Five ways to improve your mental health in 2020
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: Does the air we breathe influence our schizophrenia risk?
- Risk Of Incorrect Content: Does diet influence mental health? Assessing the evidence