The article below may contain offensive and/or incorrect content.
In this study, we investigated whether age-related deficits in cueâ€"outcome associative learning (e.g., Mutter, Atchley, & Plumlee, 2012; Mutter, DeCaro, & Plumlee, 2009; Mutter, Haggbloom, Plumlee, & Schirmer, 2006; Mutter & Williams, 2004) might be due to a decline in older adults' ability to modulate attention to relevant and irrelevant cues. In the first 2 experiments, we used standard blocking and highlighting tasks to indirectly measure the ability to shift attention away from irrelevant stimuli toward relevant, predictive cues (e.g., Kruschke, Kappenman, & Hetrick, 2005). Although there were age differences in prediction accuracy, like young adults, older adults learned to shift attention toward predictive stimuli and ignore irrelevant or less predictive stimuli. This attentional effect was unrelated to either working memory or executive function suggesting that it did not involve voluntary control processes. The third experiment provided further support for this idea. We alternated a category learning task with a dot probe task to more directly assess the development of automatic attentional biases. There were again age differences in category prediction, but young and older adults alike responded more rapidly to the location of a dot probe cued by a stimulus experienced as predictive during the learning task than one cued by a stimulus experienced as nonpredictive. These findings provide converging evidence that even though cueâ€"outcome prediction declines with age, the ability to modulate attention based on the predictive relevance of cues during associative learning remains intact. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)





Parent Site

Departments
Authors
Libraries
Current Articles
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Scientific Meeting » Transportation and Mobility Options to Support Postschool Transition for Youth with Autism
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Why more of us will feel disconnected than ever before
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Scientific Meeting » Chemogenetic Innovations in the Manipulation and Monitoring of Labeled Neurons Workshop
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: In a divided world, our common bond is the search for love and connection
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Athletes have healthier brains that can actually hear better
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: This is the future of eco architecture
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Average IQ: What is it?
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Experimental Alzheimer’s drug leaves scientists split over effectiveness
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Audio » Dr. Christopher Baker: How does the brain categorize the visual world and change with learning?
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: 16 myths about depression
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Millions of US middle and high schoolers used tobacco products in 2019
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Only ‘cat whisperers’ can read felines’ facial expressions
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: What are the benefits of NAC?
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Can art rewire our brains?
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Scientific Meeting » The NIMH Director’s Innovation Speaker Series – Psilocybin: History, Neuropharmacology, and Implications for Therapeutics
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Negative bias in people with depression is temporary
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Letter from the Editor: Feeling grateful
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: What is obsessive-compulsive personality disorder?
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: How personality traits affect the placebo response
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Sleep deprivation ‘triples the number of lapses in attention’