The article below may contain offensive and/or incorrect content.
Empirical research on the (mal-)adaptiveness of favorable self-perceptions, self-enhancement, and self-knowledge has typically applied a classical null-hypothesis testing approach and provided mixed and even contradictory findings. Using data from 5 studies (laboratory and field, total N = 2,823), we used an information-theoretic approach combined with Response Surface Analysis to provide the first competitive test of 6 popular hypotheses: that more favorable self-perceptions are adaptive versus maladaptive (Hypotheses 1 and 2: Positivity of self-view hypotheses), that higher levels of self-enhancement (i.e., a higher discrepancy of self-viewed and objectively assessed ability) are adaptive versus maladaptive (Hypotheses 3 and 4: Self-enhancement hypotheses), that accurate self-perceptions are adaptive (Hypothesis 5: Self-knowledge hypothesis), and that a slight degree of self-enhancement is adaptive (Hypothesis 6: Optimal margin hypothesis). We considered self-perceptions and objective ability measures in two content domains (reasoning ability, vocabulary knowledge) and investigated 6 indicators of intra- and interpersonal psychological adjustment. Results showed that most adjustment indicators were best predicted by the positivity of self-perceptions. There were some specific self-enhancement effects, and evidence generally spoke against the self-knowledge and optimal margin hypotheses. Our results highlight the need for comprehensive and simultaneous tests of competing hypotheses. Implications for the understanding of underlying processes are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)





Parent Site

Departments
Authors
Libraries
Current Articles
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Scientific Meeting » Transportation and Mobility Options to Support Postschool Transition for Youth with Autism
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Why more of us will feel disconnected than ever before
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Scientific Meeting » Chemogenetic Innovations in the Manipulation and Monitoring of Labeled Neurons Workshop
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: In a divided world, our common bond is the search for love and connection
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Athletes have healthier brains that can actually hear better
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: This is the future of eco architecture
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Average IQ: What is it?
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Experimental Alzheimer’s drug leaves scientists split over effectiveness
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Audio » Dr. Christopher Baker: How does the brain categorize the visual world and change with learning?
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: 16 myths about depression
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Millions of US middle and high schoolers used tobacco products in 2019
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Only ‘cat whisperers’ can read felines’ facial expressions
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: What are the benefits of NAC?
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Can art rewire our brains?
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Scientific Meeting » The NIMH Director’s Innovation Speaker Series – Psilocybin: History, Neuropharmacology, and Implications for Therapeutics
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Negative bias in people with depression is temporary
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Letter from the Editor: Feeling grateful
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: What is obsessive-compulsive personality disorder?
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: How personality traits affect the placebo response
- Risk Of Offensive/Incorrect Content: Sleep deprivation ‘triples the number of lapses in attention’